![]() ![]() ![]() The brief facts leading to this question are that the two respondents considered themselves ‘public spirited persons’ and filed a suit with ostensible object of protecting the religious feelings of other persons of same religion seeking a declaration that publication and distribution of the ‘Satyarth Prakash’ written by Swami Dayanand was injurious to the religious faith of Mohammadan Community and they wanted a perpetual injunction to be issued against the publishers and certain Arya Samaj Organizations, restraining them from publishing, printing and distributing ‘The Satyarth Prakash’ in any language.ģ. ![]() (Oral)- This petition gives rise to a question whether Civil Court can entertain a suit for banning/issuing an injunction on publication of a book, which is in existence and being published and read for last 135 years, on the ground that its publication was likely to disturb public tranquillity and public order.Ģ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |